Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 06:42:53 -0800
Ingo wrote:
the case Paul's patch is addressing: workloads which are
known to be global (and hence spreading out is the best-performing
allocation).
Just to be clear, note that even in my case, we require the node-local
policy for some allocations (into the users portion of the address
space) at the same time we require the spread policy (not
sure I like 'global' here) for other allocations (file stuff).
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- From: Paul Jackson
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- From: Ingo Molnar
- [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Prevent large file writeback starvation
- Next by Date: Re: nfsroot doesn't work with intel card since 2.6.12.2/2.6.11
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
- Index(es):