Re: Linux drivers management
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:45:48 +0000
On Maw, 2006-02-07 at 00:50 +0800, David Chow wrote:
do with talking about a stable kernel API . Even you put the driver
sources into the main kernel tree, it will still need a lot of work to
port all drivers if the API changes.
Convention is that he who breaks an API fixes up the majority of the
mess caused or does it by consensus with the other developers.
Of course if your code is out of tree nobody will know so it'll just
break.
For example the last time I edited the wdt501 watchdog I submitted
according to my logs is about 1998. Since then each person who broke an
API it used fixed it up, or the janitors did shortly afterwards.
For different compile time options that affect data structures, this is
well known a bad idea .
Do you have measured performance data, economic models and statistical
evidence to back up the claim or is this that well known bad idea called
"conventional wisdom" ?
operating system" , do you think Linux should one day or some day grow
to 1TB source tree to include all possible drivers for all hw come from
the world?
Why not. By the time it gets that big you'll have over 1TB on your phone
let alone a PC. The kernel development structure is optimised for
development.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Linux drivers management
- From: David Chow
- Re: Linux drivers management
- From: Michal Schmidt
- Re: Linux drivers management
- From: David Chow
- Linux drivers management
- Prev by Date: [RFC/PATCH] block: undeprecate ll_rw_block()
- Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH 04/20] pspace: Allow multiple instaces of the process id namespace
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux drivers management
- Next by thread: Re: Linux drivers management
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
