Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:14:08 -0700
Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 12:19 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
p.s. My apologies at the size of the CC list. It is very hard to tell who
the interested parties are, and since there is no one list we all subscribe
to other than linux-kernel how to reach everyone in a timely manner. I am
copying everyone who has chimed in on a previous thread on the subject. If
you don't want to be copied in the future tell and I will take your name off
of my list.
Is it worth creating a vger or OSDL mailing list for these discussions?
There was some concern the cc list is getting too large. :)
If yes, would "linux-containers" be an appropriate name?
I have think we can wait until the current discussion is over, as I have
not received any complaints yet.
For ongoing maintenance of the future in kernel implementation I think
it is worth setting something up.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
- From: Dave Hansen
- [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86-64: improve the format of stack dumps
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Prevent large file writeback starvation
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace
- Index(es):