Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:38:13 -0600
Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
3) How do we refer to namespaces and containers when we are not members?
- Do we refer to them indirectly by processes or other objects that
we can see and are members?
the process will be an unique identifier to the
namespace, but it might not be easy to use it, so
IMHO it might at least make sense to ...
Especially from userspace. If I want to start a checkpoint on a
container, but I have to use the process to identify the
container/namespace, well I can't uniquely specify the process by pid
anymore...
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Hubertus Franke
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- References:
- [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Kirill Korotaev
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Sam Vilain
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Serge E. Hallyn
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- From: Hubertus Franke
- The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- From: Herbert Poetzl
- [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by Date: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Previous by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Next by thread: Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|