Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:35:07 +0100
Hi!
So another flamewar is over, good. I even received one apology ;-),
and probably should have sent some apologies, too...
Anyway, it means that suspend is still quite a hot topic, and that is
good. (Linus said that suspend-to-disk is basically for people that
can't get suspend-to-RAM to work, and after I got suspend-to-RAM to
work reliably here, I can see his point).
Anyway, uswsusp project needs your help. It is basically working, see
www.sf.net/projects/suspend , and it is already faster then in-kernel
version. How you could help?
* testing is useful at this point. Few confirmations that it works in
different configurations would make us feel warm and fuzzy.
* documentation improvements, and small scripts. Having script that
prepares initrd would be nice, for example.
* having someone to maintain suspend.sf.net web pages / release CVS
snapshot as package would help, too.
* userspace code improvements. Encryption, LZW and graphical progress
should be reasonably easy to do. There's some tricky stuff, if you
prefer -- support for swap files and normal files would help,
too. Plus I guess everyone has their favourite feature...
Pavel
--
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Nigel Cunningham
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Next by Date: Re: CD-blanking leads to machine freeze with current -git [was: Re: CD writing in future Linux try #2 [ was: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) ]]
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by thread: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|