Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:59:57 -0800
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 04:52:43PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 05:35:08PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 08:27 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Nah, I don't think it's a good idea. James's patch should work just
fine.
another option is to have a "kill list" which you put the thing on, and
then wake up a thread. only 2 pointers in the object ;(
Hm, that's almost what James's patch is trying to do. Care to mock up a
patch that shows this? It might be a simpler solution.
It won't work. You might have to do 2 put_device calls on the same
structure. That's why I suggested the "pending puts" counter; something
can't go on a list more than once.
It would only go on the list if the "put" was the last one. Otherwise
it would not make any sense to put it on any list.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- From: Alan Stern
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- References:
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- From: Greg KH
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- From: Alan Stern
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- Prev by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- Next by Date: Re: readahead logic and I/O errors
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|