Re: [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- From: Charles-Edouard Ruault <ce@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:44:24 +0100
Andrew Morton wrote:
Charles-Edouard Ruault <ce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:PIO mode, which is the case for Folkert van Heusden, who reported the
i was trying to rip a CD when the whole machine started to freeze
periodicaly, i then looked at the logs and found the following :
Feb 12 19:23:39 ruault kernel: hdc: irq timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Feb 12 19:23:39 ruault kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Feb 12 19:23:39 ruault kernel: hdd: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Feb 12 19:23:39 ruault kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Feb 12 19:23:39 ruault kernel: hdd: drive not ready for command
No idea what caused that.
Feb 12 19:23:39 ruault kernel: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
The following was merged today. Hopefully it suppresses this false
positive.
From what i understand it will fix the problem only if the drive is in
same BUG output.
However it does not appear that my cdrom drives are using PIO, from the
logs i have they're supposed to use DMA :
Feb 12 19:37:12 ruault kernel: hdc: ATAPI 40X CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive,2048kB Cache, DMA
Feb 12 19:37:12 ruault kernel: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
Feb 12 19:37:12 ruault kernel: hdd: ATAPI 32X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW
drive, 2048kB Cache, UDMA(33)
sudo /sbin/hdparm -i /dev/hdc
/dev/hdc:
Model=PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W1610A, FwRev=1.05, SerialNo=
Config={ Fixed Removeable DTR<=5Mbs DTR>10Mbs nonMagnetic }
RawCHS=0/0/0, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=0
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=0kB, MaxMultSect=0
(maybe): CurCHS=0/0/0, CurSects=0, LBA=yes, LBAsects=0
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:180,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 *mdma2
AdvancedPM=no
sudo /sbin/hdparm -i /dev/hdd
/dev/hdd:
Model=_NEC DVD_RW ND-3500AG, FwRev=2.1A, SerialNo=
Config={ Removeable DTR<=5Mbs DTR>10Mbs nonMagnetic }
RawCHS=0/0/0, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=0
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=0kB, MaxMultSect=0
(maybe): CurCHS=0/0/0, CurSects=0, LBA=yes, LBAsects=0
IORDY=yes, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2
AdvancedPM=no
So i think this patch won't do me any good :(
any other idea ????
Thanks for the answer.
--
Charles-Edouard Ruault
GPG key Id E4D2B80C
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- From: Folkert van Heusden
- Re: [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- References:
- [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- From: Charles-Edouard Ruault
- Re: [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- From: Andrew Morton
- [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- Prev by Date: [patch 5/6] lightweight robust futexes: i386
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] sys_setrlimit() in 2.6.16
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG] kernel 2.6.15.4: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|