[RFC] vfs: cleanup of permission()
- From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:26:06 +0100
Hi Andrew! Christoph! Al!
after thinking some time about the oracle words
(sent in reply to previous BME submissions) we
(Sam and I) came to the conclusion that it would
be a good idea to remove the nameidata introduced
in September 2003 from the inode permission()
checks, so that vfs_permission() can take care
of them ...
this is in two parts, the first one does the
removal and the second one fixes up nfs and fuse
by passing the relevant nd_flags via the mask
Note: this is just a suggestion, so please let
us know what you think
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- [RFC 2/2] vfs: fixup nfs and fuse by passing nd_flags via mask
- From: Herbert Poetzl
- [RFC 1/2] vfs: remove nameidata from *_permission()
- From: Herbert Poetzl
- [RFC 2/2] vfs: fixup nfs and fuse by passing nd_flags via mask
- Prev by Date: Re: Memory compression (again). . help?
- Next by Date: [RFC 1/2] vfs: remove nameidata from *_permission()
- Previous by thread: SPI: cs_change usage
- Next by thread: [RFC 1/2] vfs: remove nameidata from *_permission()
- Index(es):