Re: [PATCH] OOM: initialise points variable in out_of_memory()
- From: Carlos Martín <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:05:03 +0100
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 13:13, Kurt Garloff wrote:
Hi Carlos,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:36:25PM +0100, Carlos Martin wrote:
We didn't initialise points, so the value reported was completely
random. This doesn't affect the behaviour of the funcion.
Did you observe it?
No. GCC complained about it.
In the original patch, there is
+static struct task_struct * select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints)
{
- unsigned long maxpoints = 0;
struct task_struct *g, *p;
struct task_struct *chosen = NULL;
struct timespec uptime;
+ *ppoints = 0;
And this is called from out_of_memory().
But the constrained_alloc stuff seems to use points before
select_bad_process() is called, so initializing to 0 is a
good idea. I don't remember having see the constrained_alloc
stuff, though, so I either did not look carefully enough or a
merge error happened afterwards.
It never used to be a problem because it was initialised when calling
select_bad_process().
I though it was your change, but I've looked again and it was Christoph
Lameter's commit 9b0f8b040acd8dfd23860754c0d09ff4f44e2cbc which introduced
the problem.
cmn
--
Carlos Martín Nieto | http://www.cmartin.tk
Hobbyist programmer |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] OOM: initialise points variable in out_of_memory()
- From: Kurt Garloff
- Re: [PATCH] OOM: initialise points variable in out_of_memory()
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch] task interactivity calculation (was Strange interactivity behaviour)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] OOM: initialise points variable in out_of_memory()
- Next by thread: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Index(es):