Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1

From: gsmith@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:08:21 -0500

From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>

If neither Greg nor Martin (on cc:) object, I'd prefer this patch
to be
replaced with the one in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114102840429459&q=raw
(it has a better check of the response code).

No objections here. Thanks Cornelia.

Greg Smith
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
  - From: Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
  - From: Cornelia Huck

Prev by Date: Re: Bio & Biovec-1 increasing cache size, never freed during disk IO
Next by Date: Re: Help: DGE-560T not recognized by Linux
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: I never expected to be so unwelcome
... As for the objections, I didn't see any in that thread. ... A Robin made a response to another ... posting s/he made on July 25th, ... thread somewhere might have gotten some negative responses, ...
(rec.pets.dogs.breeds)
[patch 22/33] 3w-xxxx: fix oops caused by incorrect REQUEST_SENSE handling
... -stable review patch. ... If anyone has any objections, ... 3w-xxxx emulates a REQUEST_SENSE response by simply returning nothing. ...
(Linux-Kernel)
Re: How to get a paper published as an independent unknown
... I'll add that in sales, we answer objections with canned answers, and ... You might consider an appendix of criticisms and responses, ... response, and whether your response resolved the criticism would be ... All this is hard work, of a different style from the ...
(sci.physics.research)