Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:38:55 +0100
On Út 28-02-06 00:21:53, col-pepper@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:32:07 +0100, linux-os (*** Johnson)
<linux-os@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Flash does not get zeroed to be written! It gets erased, which sets all
the bits to '1', i.e., all bytes to 0xff.
Thanks for the correction, but that does not change the discussion.
Further, the designers of
flash disks are not stupid as you assume. The direct access occurs
to static RAM (read/write stuff).
I'm not assuming anything . Some hardware has been killed by this issue.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/13/144
I have seen flash disk dead in 5 minutes, even without o-sync. Those
devices are often crap. (I copied tar file to flash by cat foo.tar >
/dev/sda. That was apparently enough to kill that flash. Label "Yahoo"
should have warned me).
Pavel
--
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- o_sync in vfat driver
- From: col-pepper
- Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: Lennart Sorensen
- Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: col-pepper
- Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: linux-os \(*** Johnson\)
- Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- From: col-pepper
- o_sync in vfat driver
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- Next by thread: Re: o_sync in vfat driver
- Index(es):