Re: [PATCH][0/8] (Targeting 2.6.17) Posix memory locking and balanced mlock-LRU semantic
- From: "Stone Wang" <pwstone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:54:17 -0500
I am preparing patch for 2.6.16, replace the name "wired" with "pinned".
Potentially, the list could be used for more purposes, than just mlocked pages.
Shaoping Wang
24 Mar 2006 15:36:46 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>:
"Stone Wang" <pwstone@xxxxxxxxx> writes:-
mlocked areas.
2. More consistent LRU semantics in Memory Management.
Mlocked pages is placed on a separate LRU list: Wired List.
If it's mlocked why don't you just called it Mlocked list?
Strange jargon makes the patch cooler? Also in meminfo
-Andi
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] swswsup: return correct load_image error
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][UPDATED PATCH 2.6.16] [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][0/8] (Targeting 2.6.17) Posix memory locking and balanced mlock-LRU semantic
- Next by thread: PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
