Re: 2.6.16-rt7 and deadlock detection.
- From: Esben Nielsen <simlo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:04:59 +0100 (MET)
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Esben Nielsen wrote:
I don't get any print outs of any deadlock detection with many of my
tests.
When there is a deadlock down() simply returns instead of blocking
forever.
rt_mutex_slowlock seems to return -EDEADLK even though caller didn't ask
for deadlock detection (detect_deadlock=0). That is bad because then the
caller will not check for it. It ought to simply leave the task blocked.
It only happens with CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES. That one also messes up the
task->pi_waiters as earlier reported.
Esben
Esben
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Esben Nielsen wrote:
It just looks like also normal, non-rt tasks are boosting.
Esben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- 2.6.16-rt10
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: 2.6.16-rt7 and deadlock detection.
- From: Ingo Molnar
- 2.6.16-rt10
- References:
- 2.6.16-rt7 and deadlock detection.
- From: Esben Nielsen
- 2.6.16-rt7 and deadlock detection.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rt7 and deadlock detection.
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 2/2] hrtimer
- Previous by thread: 2.6.16-rt7 and deadlock detection.
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rt7 and deadlock detection.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|