Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- From: Edward Chernenko <edwardspec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:14:07 -0800 (PST)
--- Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Justification, please.
You haven't even tried to explain to us what is so
broken about the
userland identd that it needs to be replaced with a
kernel version.
My point is that everything which follows this
conditions should be moved into kernel:
- must dispatch requests in a fixed time
- must work rarely, sleep most time
- must depend on internal kernel variables (for
example, established connections table)
Don't forget that many years ago there was echo daemon
in userspace. But as it's highly effective to dispatch
all echo requests in kernel, it was moved into
low-level TCP implementation.
I think that ident protocol also matches this
criteria.
Edward Chernenko <edwardspec@xxxxxxxxx>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- From: Trond Myklebust
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- From: Trond Myklebust
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- Prev by Date: [Patch:000/004]Unify pxm_to_node id ver.3.
- Next by Date: [patch-mm2] PI-futex: fix timeout race
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|