Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- From: Edward Chernenko <edwardspec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:30:23 -0800 (PST)
--- Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If so, then why khttpd _was_ included into kernel?
That has been widely acknowledged as a mistake.
You'll note that khttpd
was removed prior to the release of linux-2.6.0.
Nobody misses it.
That's bad. I think that some people need this, so my
module will be distributed like Tux webserver,
separately from kernel.
Anyway, can you help me by explaining your opinion
about my code, not about development phylosophy?
That's my first work and it's important to me to find
if I done something unefficient.
Edward Chernenko <edwardspec@xxxxxxxxx>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- From: Trond Myklebust
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 06/10] PI-futex: rt-mutex docs
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] PS/2-mouse not found in 2.6.16
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|