Re: [PATCH] rtc: Added support for ds1672 control
- From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:40:27 +0200
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:07:33 -0600 (CST)
Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
is almost ok, please check my comments below:
buf[0] = DS1672_REG_CNT_BASE;
buf[1] = secs & 0x000000FF;
buf[2] = (secs & 0x0000FF00) >> 8;
buf[3] = (secs & 0x00FF0000) >> 16;
buf[4] = (secs & 0xFF000000) >> 24;
+ buf[5] = 0;
I'd add a comment to say that 0 enables the osc.
+static int ds1672_get_control(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
[..]
+ } else
+ return val;
+}
I think it would be cleaner to define the routine as follow:
.. ds1672_get_control(...., unsigned char *status)
and to usa the space provided by the caller to store the result.
+ if (ds1672_get_control(client))
+ state = "disabled";
+ return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", state);
+}
please #define DS1672_REG_CONTROL_EOSC 0x80
and check the single bit.
+ err = ds1672_get_control(client);
ditto.
thanks for your work!
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] rtc: Added support for ds1672 control
- From: Kumar Gala
- Re: [PATCH] rtc: Added support for ds1672 control
- References:
- [PATCH] rtc: Added support for ds1672 control
- From: Kumar Gala
- [PATCH] rtc: Added support for ds1672 control
- Prev by Date: boot hang in 2.6.16-rt[7-10]
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16: Oops - null ptr in blk_recount_segments?
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] rtc: Added support for ds1672 control
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] rtc: Added support for ds1672 control
- Index(es):