Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:14:27 -0700
I'm not going to fight too hard for it (I'll let Michael champion it
if he really cares), but I think this is a legitimate -stable patch:
it fixes a panic that real users are seeing.
You were using an interface in an unintended way.
Do you know %100 for certain that moving that callback to
a different location won't break anything?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: Roland Dreier
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- References:
- [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: gregkh
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: David S. Miller
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: Roland Dreier
- [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Prev by Date: Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- Next by Date: RE: [Fastboot] [PATCH] kexec on ia64
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
