Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 18:08:34 -0700
David> I think it's too risky. It fixes a panic for infiniband.
Fair enough.
David> I think you should not have submitted such a core
David> networking change to -stable without passing it by netdev
David> CC:'ing me first.
Noted. Glad I wasn't the one who submitted it ;)
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: Roland Dreier
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: David S. Miller
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: Roland Dreier
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: David S. Miller
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Next by Date: RE: [Fastboot] [PATCH] kexec on ia64
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
