Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 10:58:39 +0300
Quoting r. David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I think it's too risky. It fixes a panic for infiniband.
Fair enough.
I think you should not have submitted such a core networking change to
-stable without passing it by netdev CC:'ing me first.
OK, note taken.
--
Michael S. Tsirkin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: Roland Dreier
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: David S. Miller
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: Roland Dreier
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- From: David S. Miller
- Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Prev by Date: Re: device model and character devices
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] ptmx fix duplicate idr_remove
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
- Next by thread: [patch 19/26] fbcon: Fix big-endian bogosity in slow_imageblit()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
