Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:47:20 -0700
Double counted a hole here, then went downhill. Does the following fix
it?
Yes, that boots. What's more the counts of pages in DMA/Normal
zone match the kernel w/o your patches too. So for tiger_defconfig
you've now exactly matched the old behaivour.
I'll try to test generic and sparse kernels later, but I have to
look at another issue now.
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: Mel Gorman
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: Mel Gorman
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: Luck, Tony
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: Mel Gorman
- [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [2/2] POWERPC: Lower threshold for DART enablement to 1GB, V2
- Next by Date: [PATCH] tpm: tpm-new-12-sysfs-files-fix-fix-fix
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- Index(es):
