Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:29:32 -0600
Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxx> writes:
Serge,
can we do nothing with sysctls at this moment, instead of commiting hacks?
Except that we modify a static table changing the uts behaviour in
proc_doutsstring isn't all that bad.
I'm just about to start on something more comprehensive, in
the sysctl case.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: Serge E. Hallyn
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
- From: Serge E. Hallyn
- [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: Serge E. Hallyn
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: Kirill Korotaev
- [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
- Prev by Date: Strange ACPI bug after resume
- Next by Date: RE: searching exported symbols from modules
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
