Re: C++ pushback
- From: Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:55:56 +0200
I don't recall anyone asking you to so much as lift a finger. Feel free to
invest your effort where you feel it will do the most good, and try not to
criticize others for doing the same with their own resources.
As far as they intend to stay away from the main kernel tree, I don't
critize anybody. But for example renaming otherwise logically named structure
members (`class' etc.) just for C++ compatibility _IS_ wasting time of
other people, who need to remember new names, review the patch and so on.
Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@xxxxxx> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: C++ pushback
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: C++ pushback
- From: Jan Engelhardt
- RE: C++ pushback
- References:
- Re: C++ pushback
- From: Martin Mares
- RE: C++ pushback
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: C++ pushback
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC] s390: Hypervisor File System
- Next by Date: Re: Compiling C++ modules
- Previous by thread: RE: C++ pushback
- Next by thread: Re: C++ pushback
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|