Re: Too many levels of symbolic links
- From: Linda Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 18:52:50 -0700
Brian D. McGrew wrote:
Because of the way our internal filesystem is setup, I'm seeing this----
error more and more.
At one time, back in the early 2.4 days, I'd made a change to the kernel
to all more links but I can't seem to find it again in 2.6. Does anyone
know off hand where this constant is defined???
Is this what you are looking for?
include/linux/namei.h MAX_NESTED_LINKS = 5
(used in fs/namei.c, where comment claims MAX_NESTING is equal to 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Too many levels of symbolic links
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Too many levels of symbolic links
- References:
- Too many levels of symbolic links
- From: Brian D. McGrew
- Too many levels of symbolic links
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/14] remap_file_pages protection support
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System
- Previous by thread: Too many levels of symbolic links
- Next by thread: Re: Too many levels of symbolic links
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
