Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data

From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:21:11 -0400

On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:

1 [softirq-timer/0]

What happens if you set the softirq-timer threads to 99?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart

References:
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Florian Paul Schmidt
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/14] remap_file_pages protection support
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 4/6] Add kmemleak support for i386
Previous by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Next by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread