Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 07:43:41 +0200
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
I haven't yet tried running with the RT Latency / Trace tools. I can try
those if folks they think they will be useful.
FWIW, enabling tracing made the 10ms failure variant fairly repeatable
here.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Lee Revell
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- References:
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Darren Hart
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Florian Paul Schmidt
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Darren Hart
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/14] NFS: Permit filesystem to perform statfs with a known root dentry [try #9]
- Previous by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- Next by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|