Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:04:49 +0200
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Careful, rt21 has a bug slipped in that might have funny results on
SMP machines:
+ if (!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]));
+ set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);
John (although he later fixed it) added a ; after the if. But the fix
is not yet in Ingo's patch.
ouch - i missed that. I've released -rt22 with this fix.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Darren Hart
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Florian Paul Schmidt
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Mike Galbraith
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- From: Steven Rostedt
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- Prev by Date: 2.6.17-rc4-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- Previous by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- Next by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
