Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data

From: Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:20:48 +0200

On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:

These tests are running on a 4 way opteron at 2 GHz with 4 GB RAM. I have
attached the .config and a listing of all the rt tasks running on the system
(which addresses the questions regarding priority setup, IRQ handlers, and
softirqs - all default). I am running with the futex priority based wakeup
patches from Sebastien Duque, but I don't think this test excercises those
paths.

Which watchdog are you using here? Have you tried without the
watchdog?

Sébastien.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart

References:
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Florian Paul Schmidt
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart

Prev by Date: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Next by Date: Re: nfsservctl() compatibility broken on AMD64?
Previous by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Next by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread