Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:29:55 -0600
Evgeniy,
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Worse: he folded the jenkins algorith result with
h ^= h >> 16;
h ^= h >> 8;
Destroying the coverage of the function.
It was done to simulate socket code which uses the same folding.
Leaving 32bit space is just wrong, consider hash table size with that
index.
Btw, that probably requires some clarification.
Since hash table size is definitely less than returned hash value, so
higher bits are removed, for that case above folding is done both in
XOR hash and my test case.
It is possible to just remove higher bits, but fairly ditributed parts
being xored produce still fairly distributed value.
h ^= h >> 16;
h ^= h >> 8;
This does not remove high order bits in either function.
Your comparison results are simply invalid with these two lines in place.
--brian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: David Miller
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: David Miller
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] iWARP Core Changes.
- Next by Date: [PATCH 6/7] AMSO1100 Message Queues.
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Next by thread: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|