Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:41:39 -0400
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:31:40PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
8390.c knows that ei_local->page_lock can only be used by an irq
context that it disabled -
btw I think this is no longer correct with the irq polling stuff Alan
added to the kernel recently...
We could make the misrouted IRQ logic skip all handlers on a disabled IRQ
but that might actually be worse than the disease we are trying to cure by
doing so.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- References:
- [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Prev by Date: Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts
- Next by Date: Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Next by thread: Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
