Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:46:08 -0600
Evgeniy,
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Since pseudo-randomness affects both folded and not folded hash
distribution, it can not end up in different results.
Yes it would, so to rule out pseudo-random effects the pseudo-
random number generator must be removed.
You are right that having test with 2^48 values is really interesting,
but it will take ages on my test machine :)
Try a usable subset; no pseudo-random number generator.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- References:
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov
- Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Prev by Date: Re: Adaptive Readahead V14 - statistics question...
- Next by Date: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Next by thread: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|