Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:35:11 -0700
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:01:23 -0700
Harry Edmon <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have a system with a strange network performance degradation from
2.6.11.12 to most recent kernels including 2.6.16.20 and 2.6.17-rc6.
The system is has Dual single core Xeons with hyperthreading on. The
application is the LDM system from UCAR/Unidata
(http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/ldm). This system requests
weather data from a variety of systems using RPC calls over a reserved
TCP port (388), puts them into a memory mapped queue file, and then
sends the data out to a variety of downstream requesting systems, again
using RPC calls. When the load is heavy, the 2.6.16.20 kernel falls way
behind with the data ingestion. The 2.6.11.12 kernel does not. I have
tried an experiment with a 2.6.17-rc6 system where it just does the
ingestion, and not the downstream distribution, and it is able to keep
up. I would really appreciate any pointers as to where the problem may
be and how to diagnose it. I have attached the config files from both
kernels and the sysctl.conf file I am using. I have also included the
output from "netstat -s" on the 2.6.16.20 system during a time when it
was having problems.
(added netdev)
A quick grep indicates that it isn't using TCP_NODELAY - we've had problems
with that in the past.
Perhaps a tcpdump of the net traffic will help to determine what's going on.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- From: Harry Edmon
- Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- References:
- Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- From: Harry Edmon
- Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: enable CPU_FTR_CI_LARGE_PAGE for cell
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.4.33-rc1] repair __ide_dma_no_op breakage
- Previous by thread: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- Next by thread: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|