Re: [PATCH] 64bit resources start end value fix



On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:15:52 -0400
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:58:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

Andrew, you don't have to apply this patch. It is supposed to be picked
by Greg.

There seems to be some confusion. Just few days back Greg consolidated
and re-organized all the 64bit resources patches and posted on LKML for
review.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115015916118671&w=2

There were few review comments regarding kconfig options.
I reworked the patch and CONFING_RESOURCES_32BIT was changed to
CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115072559700302&w=2

Now Greg's tree and your tree are not exact replica when it comes to
64bit resource patches. Hence this patch is supposed to be picked by
Greg to make sure things are not broken in his tree.

I'm working against Greg's tree, always...

I am sorry. That's a mistake on my part. I misunderstood it.

Oh.

Can you please include the attached patch.

Hopefully I'll pick it up from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-03-pci
later today?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [PATCH] 2.6 RPAPHP structure size/performance
    ... > Hi Greg, ... > Please review and apply the following patch if you find it agreeable. ... > This patch does not make any functional changes, ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.6 PCI Hotplug null pointer deref
    ... > Please review the attached patch and, if acceptable, apply to the ... > are performed on a machine that has virtual-io devices in it. ... > This patch was previously reviewed/tested by Linda Xie, ... greg k-h ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Linux 2.6.11.2
    ... Hi Greg, ... The st/ide-tape/osst llseek changes havent been applied for what reason? ... > It contains one patch, which is already in the -bk tree, and came from ... > which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers
    ... Greg, you are Cc'ed for your joke in... ... maximum the one person who applies a patch reviews it ("review" as in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [ofa-general] Further 2.6.23 merge plans...
    ... Write a patch to add P_Key handling to user_mad in the way we ... I'll mostly just be able to review it. ... Any opinions about merging, for or against, would be ... the tree I asked Linus to pull, ...
    (Linux-Kernel)