Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
- From: Danial Thom <danial_thom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
--- Alistair John Strachan
<s0348365@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Friday 23 June 2006 00:37, Danial Thom
wrote:
Of course you folks could never really knowthat,
because the tools to measure things don'twork,
and you all seem to be using systems that areso
kludged up that you don't even know whatyou're
measuring.
Next time attach a patch fixing, or at least
bother to investigate the problem
which you're so rudely flaming about. Maybe
Linux is broken. Nobody said it
wasn't. But you're closer to (and clearly care
more about) the problem than
99% of the people reading your email.
So why don't you help fix it, instead of laying
into Erik and the netdev
people (who incidentally aren't CC'ed)?
When you report a problem and some clown pipes in
with "its not a problem, linux is just so fast it
doesn't use any cpu!" you really don't have the
foundation for coming up with a solution or
helping to find one.
DT
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
- From: Alistair John Strachan
- Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: tracking shared dirty pages -v10
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch][RFC] Disabling per-tgid stats on task exit in taskstats
- Previous by thread: Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
- Next by thread: Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|