Re: Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1

From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:00:05 +1000

On Monday June 26, andre@xxxxxxxx wrote:

Neil Brown wrote:
<snip>

Alternately you can apply the following patch to the kernel and
version-1 superblocks should work better.

-stable material?

Maybe. I'm not sure it exactly qualifies, but I might try sending it
to them and see what they think.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1
  - From: Ronald Lembcke
- Re: Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1
  - From: Neil Brown
- Re: Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1
  - From: Andre Tomt

Prev by Date: [Suspend2][ 15/20] [Suspend2] Attempt to freeze processes.
Next by Date: [Suspend2][ 6/9] [Suspend2] Get nonconflicting page.
Previous by thread: Re: Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1
Next by thread: [PATCH] swsuspend breakage in 2.6.17-git
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread