Re: [RFC][patch 00/44] Consolidate irq_action flags
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 16:43:38 -0700
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 14:54:18 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The recent interrupt rework introduced bit value conflicts with sparc.
Instead of introducing new architecture flags mess, move the interrupt
SA_ flags out of the signal namespace and replace them by interrupt
related flags.
This allows to remove the obsolete SA_INTERRUPT flag and clean up
the bit field values.
The patch was mostly created by a script, manually fixed up and reviewed.
Compile tested on various platforms. Boot tested on i386/x86_64
The amount of downstream wreckage from these changes is remarkably small -
I only had to diddle four or five patches and none of the git trees appear
to be affected. Right now, when the subsystems trees are maximally-merged
is the best time for this sort of thing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC][patch 00/44] Consolidate irq_action flags
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- [RFC][patch 00/44] Consolidate irq_action flags
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Next by Date: [3/5][POWERPC] boot: use more Kbuild rules
- Previous by thread: [RFC][patch 41/44] usb: Use the new IRQF_ constansts
- Next by thread: Q: locking mechanisms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
