Re: [PATCH] i386: clean up user_mode() use
- From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 16:10:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20060702133718.GA27549@xxxxxxx>
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:37:18 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
to avoid such mistakes in the future, the suggested solution is to
make user_mode() on i386 consistent with the generic expectation and
make it detect any user mode execution context, that is, it should
take the role of user_mode_vm() and a new user_mode_novm() is
introduced for the i386 specific cases where v86 mode can be excluded.
in short, the patch simply does a
user_mode_vm -> user_mode
user_mode -> user_mode_novm
substitution as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: PaX Team <pageexec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
agreed!
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Please make that second one
user_mode_novm86
Otherwise people might think it means "user mode no virtual memory."
--
Chuck
"You can't read a newspaper if you can't read." --George W. Bush
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: clean up user_mode() use
- From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386: clean up user_mode() use
- Prev by Date: Re: Huge problem with XFS/iCH7R
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Airprime driver improvements to allow full speed EvDO transfers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: clean up user_mode() use
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: clean up user_mode() use
- Index(es):