Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Jim Crilly <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:37:33 -0400
On 07/27/06 04:31:07PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote:
Since reiser4 is not something enabled by default into a default kernel
distribution, I assume they enabled it knowing what they where doing because
they wanted to use it.
Or because they did 'allmodconfig' or 'allyesconfig'. Whenever I build
a kernel I enabled everything possible as a module in case I ever need
it. For instance, a few weeks ago I had the reiserfs module loaded because
I was testing something, if I had klive running it would have said that I
use reiserfs when in fact I don't.
Jim.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Luigi Genoni
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Horst H. von Brand
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Luigi Genoni
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Bad ext3/nfs DoS bug
- Next by Date: Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- Previous by thread: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|