Re: [PATCH 1/3] usbhid: Driver for microsoft natural ergonomic keyboard 4000
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 21:30:56 -0400
On Sunday 30 July 2006 20:48, liyu wrote:
Pavel Machek Wrote:
Hi!Well, however, this can work truly. If we do not hack as this way.
This new version get some improvements:
2. Support left paren key "(", right paren key ")", equal key "=" on
right-top keypad. In fact, this keyboard generate KEYPAD_XXX usage code
for them, but I find many applications can not handle them on default
configuration, especially X.org. To get the most best usability, I use a
bit magic here: map them to "Shift+9" and "Shift+0".
That is hardly 'improvement'. 'X is broken, so lets break input, too'.
Many applications can not get its input. I think the usability for
most people should be first, but not follow rules.
I do not quite understand why X would have issues with it. KEY_KPEQUAL,
KEY_KPLEFTPAREN and KEY_KPRIGHTPAREN should work fine even with legacy
X keyboard driver (one that is using PS/2 protocol instead of evdev).
You might want to adjust your XKB map or use xmodmap, but kernel should
report true keycodes.
I think we can add one module parameter like "shift_hack" to switch it ?!
No please don't.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: XFS Bug null pointer dereference in xfs_free_ag_extent
- Next by Date: Re: Generic battery interface
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usbhid: Driver for microsoft natural ergonomic keyboard 4000
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usbhid: Driver for microsoft natural ergonomic keyboard 4000
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|