Re: [PATCH 006 of 9] md: Remove the working_disks and failed_disks from raid5 state data.
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:43:28 +0400
NeilBrown wrote:
They are not needed.
conf->failed_disks is the same as mddev->degraded
By the way, `failed_disks' is more understandable than `degraded'
in this context. "Degraded" usually refers to the state of the
array in question, when failed_disks > 0.
That to say: I'd rename degraded back to failed_disks, here and
in the rest of raid drivers... ;)
/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 003 of 9] md: Factor out part of raid1d into a separate function.
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 006 of 9] md: Remove the working_disks and failed_disks from raid5 state data.
- Next by thread: [PATCH 008 of 9] md: Remove working_disks from raid1 state data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|