Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
- From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:28:44 -0500
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:07:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Matt Mackall wrote:
I'm resending this as-is because the earlier thread petered out
without any strong arguments against this approach. x86_64 patch to
follow.
"No strong arguments?"
I still maintain that this patch has the wrong priority in case more
than one set of arguments are provided.
But you still haven't answered how that lets you work around firmware
that passes parameters you don't like.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
- References:
- [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
- From: Matt Mackall
- Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
- Prev by Date: [patch 3/3] convert CONFIG tag for a few accounting data used by CSA
- Next by Date: Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
