Re: [PATCH 2/3] add-force-of-use-mmconfig.patch

Andrew Morton schrieb:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:26:15 +0200
Edgar Hucek <hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Andrew Morton schrieb:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:28:14 +0200
Edgar Hucek <hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This Patch add force for mmconfig. On Intel Macs the efi firmaware gives
a different memory map then ACPI_MCFG provides. This makes the check wether
to use mmconfig or not fail.
Sorry, you cannot do this. I already merged this patch into -mm, and
followed that up with two bugfix patches, both of which you were copied on.

Now you're sending out the original patch, without the bugfixes which
Adrian and I prepared.

If you think these patches should be merged into 2.6.18 at this late a
stage, please give reasons and if they're agreeable I can send it all to
Linus. But sending out known-buggy stuff which has already been fixed
doesn't help anyone.

Also, please don't use filenames as patch descriptions. See section 2 of
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt.

Thanks.

I see only one bugfix patch in your patches ( add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix.patch )
which is now included in this patch.


I presently have

add-force-of-use-mmconfig.patch
add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix.patch
add-force-of-use-mmconfig-fix-2.patch

and

add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-tidy.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-fix.patch
add-efi-e820-memory-mapping-on-x86-fix-2.patch

all of which you should have been cc'ed on.

Anyway, unless there's a rush on this work, please check that everything
looks OK in -mm as we head into 2.6.19-rc1.


Mea culpa. Looked at the wrong place. I checked the patches in mm and they look ok.

cu

Edgar Hucek

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/