Re: [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:07:36 -0400
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 13:22 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
list_del_init(&pi_state->owner->pi_state_list);
list_add(&pi_state->list, &new_owner->pi_state_list);
pi_state->owner = new_owner;
+ atomic_inc(&pi_state->refcount);
There really needs to be a get_pi_state() or some variant. Having to do
a manual atomic_inc is very dangerous.
I understand the need to grab the wait_lock in order to serialize
rt_mutex_next_owner(), but why the addition of of the atomic_inc() and the
free_pi_state() ? And if we do need them, shouldn't we place them around the
use of the pi_state, rather than just before the unlock calls?
Hmm, is the inc really needed? The hb->lock is held through this and
the pi_state can't go away while that lock is held.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- From: Esben Nielsen
- Re: [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- References:
- [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- From: Esben Nielsen
- Re: [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- From: Darren Hart
- [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- Prev by Date: Re: swsusp hangs on headless resume-from-ram
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix vmstat per cpu usage
- Previous by thread: Re: [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- Next by thread: Re: [-rt] Fix race condition and following BUG in PI-futex
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|