Re: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:40:58 -0600
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:58:49AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
alignment
Currently there are 33 patches in my tree to do this.
The weirdest symptom I have had so far is that page faults did not
trigger the early exception handler on x86_64 (instead I got a reboot).
There is one outstanding issue where I am probably requiring too much
on the arch/i386 kernel.
Can anyone find anything else?
I am running into compilation failure on x86_64.
I'm not quite certain what is wrong, except that you haven't
applied all of my patches.
The x86_64 ones do depend on the i386 ones to some extent.
That is why it was one giant patchset.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
- From: Vivek Goyal
- [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/33] i386 boot: Add an ELF header to bzImage
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 8 of 13] Add a bootparameter to reserve high linear address space for hypervisors
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
