Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:55:19 +0400
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:24:03PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
As the first step we want to propose for discussion
the most complicated parts of resource management:
kernel memory and virtual memory.
Do you have any plans to post a CPU controller? Is that tied to UBC
interface as well?
Not everything at once :) To tell the truth I think CPU controller
is even more complicated than user memory accounting/limiting.
No, fair CPU scheduler is not tied to UBC in any regard.
As we discussed before, it is valuable to have an ability to limit
different resources separately (CPU, disk I/O, memory, etc.).
For example, it can be possible to place some mission critical
kernel threads (like kjournald) in a separate contanier.
This patches are related to kernel memory and nothing more :)
Thanks,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- From: Chandra Seetharaman
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- From: Kirill Korotaev
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri
- [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH 38/75] scsi: drivers/scsi/megaraid.c pci_module_init to pci_register_driver conversion
- Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH 68/75] net: drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c pci_module_init to pci_register_driver conversion
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|