rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:37:22 -0700
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:21:35PM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
On 8/18/06, hui Bill Huey <billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Patch attached:
The problem still appears to happen, but now I get no trace at all,
just a single line reported to the machine's console (and not on the
serial console):
pdflush/314[CPU#2]: BUG in debug_rt_mutex_unlock at
kernel/rt_mutex_debug.c:471
i.e., a standard statement, except at pdflush instead of swapper this time.
Thanks for testing. I appreciate this and I'm more than just plain willing
to help out. Any thing goes to get this patch solid. :)
I'll come up with a patch tomorrow to try and get a clean stack trace. I've
made some change to the bug dump output to make it more preemption aware,
but, as you can, some tweeking is needed.
However, I don't think this is going to be a simple atomic violation problem
that I've seen numerous times before. That's what the previous patch tried to
address. It's seriously pointing to a problem with the rtmutex and/or how it's
used, maybe a corner case it's missing.
I'll start to look at it either tonight or tomorrow and see what's going on.
It's going to take me a bit so be patient. I'll definitely get back to you
on this. I've got a number of weeks to blow exclusively on -rt development,
so I'll be around for a little while longer, hopefully longer.
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: hui
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: hui
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Robert Crocombe
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: hui
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Robert Crocombe
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: hui
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Robert Crocombe
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: hui
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Robert Crocombe
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|