Re: [PATCH 17/17] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer [try #2]

From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:46:23 +0100

David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Can you put this two into a single ifdef block?

I suppose it could make sense to move the two disk random source functions
together.

I don't think I should. drivers/char/random.c seems to be carefully laid out
with similar functions grouped together under grouping banners.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 17/17] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer [try #2]
  - From: David Howells
- Re: [PATCH 17/17] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer [try #2]
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 01/17] BLOCK: Move functions out of buffer code [try #2]
  - From: David Howells
- [PATCH 17/17] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer [try #2]
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: [PATCH 1 of 23] IB/ipath - More changes to support InfiniPath on PowerPC 970 systems
Next by Date: 2.6.18-rc4-* LVM issues from initrd.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 17/17] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer [try #2]
Next by thread: [PATCH 03/17] BLOCK: Stop fallback_migrate_page() from using page_has_buffers() [try #2]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread