Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Aug 2006 09:35:17 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:
The _syscallX macros were originally used by libc implementations,
but now there is no libc that can be built against an up-to-date
kernel an relies on them.
The only users of these macros are the __KERNEL_SYSCALLS_, which
are now gone as well, after execve has been removed from the
kernel.
I would prefer to keep them on i386/x86-64 at least because
a lot of my test programs are using them.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
- References:
- [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.16-git6 broke X11 on Ultra5 with ATI Mach64
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
