Re: Drop cache has no effect?
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:49:45 -0700
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:21:25 +0200 (MEST)
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 jengelh users 37816633 2006-07-28 19:25
inkscape-0.44-2.guru.suse101.i686.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 jengelh users 297243 2006-08-15 01:13
vmware-any-any-update104.tar.gz
Remains 644.
That would be a vfat problem - the changed permission bits weren't written
back to disk, so when you re-read them from disk (or, more likely, from
blockdev pagecache) they came back with the original values.
Yes, that's _intended_.
Fact:
If you chmod 644 some files on vfat, then unmount and mount it again, they show
up as 755 again. That is ok.
Observation:
Dropping the cache does not imply the 644->755 change observed on unmount.
Conclusion:
Caches not dropped.
Not all caches dropped. It'd be silly to try that - see the implementation.
Running the same command a few more times might wring a couple more dentries
and inodes out of it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Drop cache has no effect?
- From: Jan Engelhardt
- Re: Drop cache has no effect?
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: Drop cache has no effect?
- From: Jan Engelhardt
- Drop cache has no effect?
- Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH -mm] Make it possible to disable serial console suspend
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: VM deadlock avoidance framework
- Previous by thread: /proc/net/tcp information drop
- Next by thread: Re: Drop cache has no effect?
- Index(es):