[PATCH 0/6] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__, try #3

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:43:56 +0200

This should address all comments I got for the second version.
Since there is no common agreement on what should happen to
the _syscallX macros, I'm not touching them at all this time.

Whoever wants to remove, reenable or replace them, should send
a separate set of patches for these. With my patches, these
macros are not used in the kernel, and not useable from user
space, so we should probably do _something_ about them.

Arnd <><

--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__, try #3
  - From: David Howells
- [PATCH 4/6] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- [PATCH 6/6] remove remaining errno and __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ references
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- [PATCH 3/6] provide kernel_execve on all architectures
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- [PATCH 1/6] introduce kernel_execve
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- [PATCH 2/6] rename the provided execve functions to kernel_execve
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- [PATCH 5/6] sh64: remove the use of kernel syscalls
  - From: Arnd Bergmann

Prev by Date: [PATCH 6/6] remove remaining errno and __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ references
Next by Date: [PATCH 4/6] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
Previous by thread: [S390] empty function defines.
Next by thread: [PATCH 5/6] sh64: remove the use of kernel syscalls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread