Re: [PATCH] i386: rwlock.h fix smp alternatives fix
- From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:17:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200608311011.45844.ak@xxxxxxx>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:11:45 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Here's the patch as intended for reference :/ Or Chris' incremental
is fine.
i386: Remove alternative_smp
The .fill causes miscompilations with some binutils version.
Has the dust settled enough to prepare a patch for -stable now?
--
Chuck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: rwlock.h fix smp alternatives fix
- From: Chris Wright
- Re: [PATCH] i386: rwlock.h fix smp alternatives fix
- Prev by Date: Re: bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?
- Next by Date: Re: bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: rwlock.h fix smp alternatives fix
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: rwlock.h fix smp alternatives fix
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
